SAINTS PRESERVE US
A + B = C: Unintended Consequences
National food and pharmacy giant Loblaw
last week allowed to The Canadian Press
that it might have been a glutton for too much of a good algorithm. Apparently
the chain’s implementation of an artificially intelligent marketing strategy
derived from data extracted from its customer loyalty program and designed to
increase profit has, in fact, done the exact opposite. This is not pathetic
fallacy or mere coincidence, Alanis Morissette, this is O. Henry irony writ
large in red ink.
Arithmetic has never been one of my core
strengths. But through six decades of life I’ve worked out a sort of formula
akin to an equation by reading literature, studying history, staying current
with the day’s news and examining my own life: action A intended to affect (not
always successfully) outcome B inevitably creates unintended consequence C;
where A is the constant, B is the variable and C is the constant variable, the
proverbial spanner in the works. More often than not it’s prudent to be careful
what you wish for.
Loblaw’s enhanced marketing plan failed to
achieve its main goal, boost same store sales. It also inadvertently encouraged
loyal customers to buy more goods which provided the retailer slimmer margins.
Sometimes it’s just simpler to fix the price of bread. An analog aside: same
store sales somewhat stubbornly remain the golden metric of retail success even
though most retailers are on board with their own cannibalistic e-commerce
platforms.
Should you take a moment to do the math,
(in your head or in my case with a Texas Instruments calculator), you’ll
quickly realize that our postmodern world is rife with ABCs and always has
been. There is always a compelling, if flawed, argument to insert a sabot into
the gears of progress and advancement because, truthfully, nothing ever seems
to work out as planned. The Internet and its utilization to invade privacy, and
spread hate speech and propaganda is an obvious culprit to target, right up
there with the internal combustion engine whose proliferation has had a
resoundingly negative impact on architectural design, land usage and hey,
strange weather we’re having these days.
However the alternatives to progress
present portfolios overstuffed with their own unintended consequences. Stasis
is stultifying and unnatural; planned regression is just insanity, Canute could
not roll back the tides and even Cher cannot
turn back time. Though Loblaw’s stumble this quarter may constitute a
technophobe’s wet dream, the company’s only way forward is to tweak its
algorithms and their usage, keep on keeping on until they get it right.
No comments:
Post a Comment