SAINTS PRESERVE US
Sussex Royal Pain
Through the course of three novels my
various characters (or paper-thin cut-outs should you dislike my work) may have
been furious, irate or angry but none of them ever “saw red” or got “mad as
hell.” Clichés though true must be avoided. At any and all costs. At the end of
the day, it’s a trying chore to look at something from 30,000 feet, especially
an existential threat.
My style is dense. Though I derive a charge,
a buzz, packing as much information into a compound sentence as I can, a
fleeting instant of time, “now,” would never be typed as a “juncture of
maturation.” Sometimes an elevator is just that, not a compartmentalized
vertical personnel hoisting device.
Politics and commerce are particularly
fecal, fetid and fertile sources of gibberish and jargon. If you’ve ever
uttered the phrases “boots on the ground” or “mission creep,” you’d better have
been under fire whilst clad in camouflage. I’m a retired ad man. As such, I
feel particularly possessive - possibly pedantic, about my industry’s idiotic
nouns and verbs because so many have bled into the common lexicon. So, do not spin
mangled, marketing malarkey to me about your personal brand. Unless you’re a cattle
rancher, it does not exist.
The post-modern wasteland is littered with
vacuous souls who mistook their ironic Warholian 15 minutes of tabloid fame as
affirmations of personal branding. Greetings to the cast of Jersey Shore, Tila Tequila, Paris Hilton
and her crude, gossipy fan-boy Perez Hilton: all you exhibited were some
alarming personal peccadilloes and characteristics.
Consider now the unraveling of the noble
House of Windsor, a smooth segue. I admire Queen Elizabeth II because if I woke
up each morning as a matriarch contemplating the condition of my England and my
family, I’d commence the day with a few hefty snifters of brandy and a
speedball. Canadian parliamentary democracy demands that I respect Her Majesty
as my country’s head of state. Fair enough. Now, about the trouble with Harry
and Meghan…
In these modern times a cur gets carte
blanche as an emotional support animal and people apparently earn income as
life coaches, activists and social media influencers. And so, what to do with a
pair of accidental celebrities who have nothing to offer the world except
perhaps some tittering, value-added Park Avenue cocktail soiree chatter?
“I remember a particular evening at the
palace rather well. Mummy was nattering on about colonics or land mines, some
such nonsense. Grandpapa made a witticism about slitty-eyed foreigners and spurting
spotted dick, as was his wont. The Duke of York, Uncle Andrew, was attempting
to grope the Swedish au pair when he stepped on one of Her Highness’s corgi
dogs. I say, both bitches howled. Oh, how we laughed. I must express to you,
rather confidentially, that Grandmama was not amused.”
P.G. Wodehouse meets the Davos set. Being
crowned king is one hell of a long shot even utilizing a trained sniper, and so
why shouldn’t the minor royals transform their union into a brand and act as its
mascots just as Martha Stewart, Oprah and that odious vulgarian who holds the
highest executive office in the United States have done? The recently unveiled
Sussex Royal brand is to date devoid of equity, that ethereal, emotional tug
that attracts and keeps customers engaged and spending. At this juncture of
maturation, the only viable metric available to quantify the value of brand
Sussex Royal is a complete accounting of expenses incurred up to its soft
launch. The ad executives, the designers, the copywriters, the web coders, the
flacks and lawyers all must be paid.
Harry and Meghan have yet to demonstrate
any discernable business acumen. My scorn for their instant brand is tempered
somewhat by my amusement at their wide-eyed optimism for its prospects. According
to reports the Sussex Royal mark is available to be applied to a plethora of
products and services. Contrarily, an established, successful brand tends to
reside in a particular category. Categories can be broad, “lifestyle” or
“finance” maybe, but rarely scattershot. A distiller will not try to sell you a
car.
Their business plan has already encountered
hitches in the form of frivolous trademark infringement legal filings. I’m
reminded somewhat of the sleazy, opportunistic rush to register internet domain
names at the height of the dot-com boom. Not only does Harry’s and Meghan’s
Sussex Royal brand have no cachet, they may not even own its rights. These poor
disadvantaged and disenfranchised kids, already exiled to the wilds of the
Dominion of Canada, just can’t seem to catch a break.
No comments:
Post a Comment