SAINTS PRESERVE US
The Ministry of Truth
Oh, whither Alberta. I live in the only
Canadian province or territory that possesses what its government describes in
all seriousness as a ‘war room.’ Thing is, the United States hasn’t attempted
an invasion of Canada for more than two hundred years and, gee, the Russians
don’t appear to be coming anytime soon. War is a federal jurisdiction, anyway.
Still, a bunker mentality coupled with an inward-looking ‘us and them’ outlook
apparently makes fine policy.
The Canadian Energy Centre (CEC) is neither
an industry lobby association nor an independent think tank. It is instead the
recently grown propaganda lizard tail of Alberta’s ruling United Conservative
Party (UCP) government. Publicly funded in a winter of austerity to an annual
tune of $30-million, the vaguely Orwellian CEC is also shielded from the
public’s right to know; freedom of information requests are simply missed
messages, droppings in tailings ponds.
The centre’s mission is twofold: Alberta’s
archaic single resource economy based on unrefined fossil fuel extraction must
be promoted and preserved at any cost; Alberta’s enemies, who include
indigenous Canadians, eastern Canadians, British Columbians and rich, sinister
foreign forces who believe in viable energy alternatives, must be tarred and
feathered. It’s just so much easier to complain and spin as opposed to looking
forward and then making some harsh and necessary (albeit unpopular) decisions
on behalf of the electorate for the greater good. Goddamn, if seven months into
a four-year mandate isn’t the perfect time to display some sensible, worldly
political courage; we voters can be awfully forgetful years away from an
election.
The UCP’s ‘Ministry of Truth’ botched it
from the start. Every war room needs a logo apparently because even SPECTRE in
the James Bond movies has a logo (SMERSH, a genuine and lethal Soviet assassination
bureau did not get hung up on PR). The CEC’s commissioned logo, designed by a
Calgary firm I’ve never heard of, was one for this digital age, bold and simple,
an easily distinguishable visual prompt intended to function as an iPhone
thumbnail or social media avatar. Touch this?
Consider a classic modern logo: Amazon: a
soft, curvy lowercase font, underscored by a smiling arrow that points from A
to Z; if it doesn’t say it all it surely suggests possibilities. The CEC logo
looked like a pair of half drawn cubes accentuated by an imperfect isosceles
triangle which might be a shadow inside the smaller cube and which of course
points in three directions. Geometry can be tricky for artists but the real
problem was that the CEC symbol was exactly the same as that of a NASDAQ-traded
US software firm. Their logo in its original colour and context remains a
cryptic symbol. It doesn’t indicate anything to me about what that company
does. Maybe they sell square Marks-A-Lots.
Any reputable ad shop will do its due
diligence before presenting a client with a proposed logo or slogan. Any client
with a shred of common sense will pay those minor fees upfront because the
alternative, litigation following the production of all related materials, is
an expensive hassle and ultimately, once public knowledge, destroys credibility
utterly. Can’t even get that right, eh? How hard can it be?
What’s worrisome about the CEC (and other such
agencies), its inauspicious and inept debut aside, is that it exists. It used
to be that government communiqués fell into two categories: public service
announcements and press releases from various ministries. The latter were never
published or broadcast verbatim by the Canadian media. Beat reporters,
knowledgeable and dogged, not party acolytes, would vet the capital’s spin. The
decline of traditional media in the Information Age has created a gaping niche
only to be filled by the likes of CEC; we are losing our objective filters.
More and more we are watching and reading
what they want us to watch and read.
Should I find the idea of a war room and a stolen logo laughable, should I be
disinclined to absorb what they want me
to, well, I can easily find alternative sources of misinformation that dovetail
with my own ill-informed views. But
what’s the point of that? It’s too easy to take an inflexible position. I may
not qualify for MENSA but nor am I simple. I don’t want war; I’d be happier
with a modicum of civil, rational debate and a little forward thinking.
Inclusive discussion could ensure everybody wins.
No comments:
Post a Comment