A FAN’S NOTES
The Circle Is Unbroken
That lascivious tongue has been part of
popular culture for 45 years. Rolling Stones Records was launched in 1971 with
the ‘Brown Sugar’ maxi-single whose B-side was backed with both ‘Bitch’ and a
live version of Chuck Berry’s ‘Let It Rock’ recorded during the Stones’ 1970
European tour. That disc is rarer than a 21st century Stones studio
release, but not by much.
There is a fundamental advertising rule:
never, ever mess with your visual identity, your logo. That poor tongue has
been through the wringer: nails have been pounded through it; baseball and
football stitches have been added; it’s been blown to bits. Last Friday you
could find it in record shops tinged an electric overdose blue. The justified
and ancient brand didn’t even bother putting its name on the Blue & Lonesome album cover because
we all know and recognize that lick.
Once I was seduced by the Rolling Stones, a
little before puberty – likely not a coincidence, the natural question to ask
was, what do they listen to? That was how I met and fell in love with the
blues. It’s too facile to say that Blue
& Lonesome could have been their 1963 debut although the 12 Chicago tracks chosen by
the 2016 incarnation of the band could easily have comprised that first album.
The original sextet could not maintain its
purist stance for a long, long while. There were too many personalities and
outside influences, push-me-pull-you. The first big Stones hit was a casual
gift from John Lennon and Paul McCartney. For every ‘Little Red Rooster’ there
was the Bo Diddley beat, songs by Chuck Berry, Bobby Womack, Otis Redding and
Solomon Burke, and ballads composed by Jagger and Richards. The band was too
talented not to evolve and create its unique noise.
Worshipping the blues as teenagers and
understanding them as senior citizens are two very different things. While the
elevated lifestyle of a Rolling Stone is beyond my capacity of comprehension, I
can relate to the universal human trials of financial and personal failure, divorce,
death, suicide, cancer and addiction. We’re not that different. In his
autobiography Keith Richards’ ghost wrote that the true essence of the other, mercurial
Glimmer Twin was to be heard in his harmonica playing, and how Mick is one of
the best there ever was. Blue &
Lonesome is weathered and inspired, a document of experience and lives
lived. It could never have sounded this authentic in 1963 even if the songs had
been cut at 2120 South Michigan
Avenue .
After the cut, pasted and overdubbed
pastiche that was 1981’s Tattoo You,
Stones albums became increasingly infrequent. Fans had grown used to two-year
gaps but no more. While the group ineptly managed its petty internal dynamics
rock music was relegated in status to a sub-genre of popular music. Meanwhile a
complacent industry was blindsided by digital disruption; sad sacks like me
recording mix tapes home alone on Friday nights were no longer a problem worthy
of addressing.
The circus
maximus that is the 21st century touring version of the Rolling Stones
is always capable of churning out another Stonesy rocker for yet another
compilation. The songs are good, if out of time, yet they don’t quite resonate
like the crowd pleasing warhorses on Through
the Past, Darkly. ‘Don’t Stop’ would have made a fine unheralded gem on the
side two of Undercover. ‘One More
Shot’ might have added a half star rating to the abysmal Dirty Work – the ad campaign was better than the music: Pure Hearts;
Clean Minds; Dirty Work. I’ve long wished the corporation would cease purveying
second rate takes on ‘Start Me Up’ and get back to their roots. I did not
expect an album of Chicago
blues covers. NOBODY EXPECTED AN ALBUM OF CHICAGO
BLUES COVERS!
Cover albums by artists revered for their
songwriting chops are alarming releases, possibly droopy white flags waving
from dry wells. Ray Davies and John Fogerty have each released covers of
themselves in concert with admiring acolytes. Nobel laureate Bob Dylan has
recently mined Frank Sinatra standards twice over. My favourite record in the sub-sub-genre,
until last Friday, was Lennon’s Rock ‘n’
Roll. Maybe it was just a placeholder from a lost weekend that stretched
into years, but Rock ‘n’ Roll provided
autobiography and context, a personally curated diary of Lennon’s formative
years even if I was left to wonder how he managed the leap from Chuck Berry to
‘Strawberry Fields’ to ‘Working Class Hero.’
No comments:
Post a Comment