SAINTS PRESERVE US
Way Off Target
Target Corporation did indeed change the
Canadian retail landscape. Shopping malls across the country are now lacking a
major anchor tenant. The department store’s Dunkirk, the epic fiasco of its first foreign
foray is the paradoxical result of hitherto exceptional branding.
Logos and wordmarks are visual
representations of a brand. Any steer would say so. Target’s graphic identity
is sublime in its simplicity, its ease of application for any medium and its
instant identification; it doesn’t get any more basic than a dot within a
circle. Symbols, while often easily rendered, carry a lot of abstract weight.
A brand is a tacit contract between its
purveyors and its adherents, sellers to buyers: In exchange for your money and
your loyalty we will provide you with status or self-esteem or something as
mundane as a decent product at a reasonable price; you have expectations of us
which we will meet and strive to exceed. It’s all about the consumer’s
carefully manipulated perception. The curse of evolving a commodity or service
into a beloved brand is a razor-thin tightrope, the margin for error becomes
miniscule and it’s a long way down from the giddy heights of an engineered
acme.
Target’s brand equity in Canada before
its expansion into this country was pure gold. The vast majority of Canada’s
citizens live within a reasonable proximity to the American border. Target was
a destination worth enduring Customs for. Cheap chic fashion and other goods of
seemingly better quality than those rummaged in Wal-Mart and anyway, no one up
here had ever scrolled through an e-mail photo montage entitled ‘Shoppers of
Target.’ Low cost class, eh? The Canadian financial press was as excited as
Canadian consumers, goodwill and thrill.
No comments:
Post a Comment